![]() |
|
||
HMA Position Paper Opposition To Physician-Assisted Suicide/Death Issue: In the last several decades, medical technology has made tremendous advances in saving and extending lives. As a result, life expectancy has increased dramatically. However, because the quality of end-or-life care has not advanced as quickly, there has been a surge in proposals to legalize physician-assisted suicide. Position: Consistent with the policies of the American Medical Association AMA the HMA strongly opposes any bill to legalize Physician assisted suicide or death. The issue of physician assisted suicide is a highly charged and emotional issue. Oftentimes, there is confusion as to the distinction between withholding or withdrawing treatment and assisted suicide. There is a critical difference, both ethically and in practice, between a patient's right to refuse unwanted medical treatment and active medical intervention which brings about death. AMA's Board of Trustees Report (#48) issued in 1996 articulates well the HMA's views on this issue: It states:
There are preferable alternatives to end-of-life care rather than helping patients to kill themselves. Physicians need to learn to better recognize when pain is not being sufficiently treated as well as signs of depression. In fact, extreme pain and depression are two of the main reasons patients request physician-assisted suicide. This is why last year the AMA initiated an ambitious, two-year project known as the Education for Physicians on End-of-Life Care (EPEC) program. The goal of EPEC is to help improve the care given by physicians to dying patients by developing a standardized, core curriculum that will train physicians in the basic knowledge and skills they need in order to appropriately care for patients at the end of life. The curriculum will focus on communication, ethical decision-making, palliative care, psychosocial considerations and symptom management. In addition to better physician education on end-of-life care, the HMA supports the following:
It is unwise to rush into an unprecedented change in a profession's calling without allowing time to see the effect of physician and public educational programs, better pain management, greater hospice availability and use of living wills on end-or-life care. We believe these initiatives are a more rational response than allowing physician-assisted suicide to become an accepted "therapeutic alternative." The words of ethicist Hans Jonas summarize well the consequences
of embarking upon the dangerous path of legalized physician-assisted
suicide: "The role of taker of life must |
HPACC members are:
|
||
![]() |
|||
| Home | Position
Statement | Better End of Life Care Legislature | News | Get Involved | FAQ | Links |
|||
6301 Pali Highway |
This site is developed and hosted by MuntadaNet, Inc. |